College papers help

What properties of a thesis make it defensible

Whichever type you are doing, they all have one common feature: Having an argument map planned out can be helpful for people in both the early and later stages of a research project. Filling out your argument map To fill out your argument map, do the following.

You are here

Underneath the research question or aims, you'll see 'Argument' or 'Central narrative'. If it doesn't, do you need to clarify the argument? Or do you need to refine your research question? The introduction column outlines common elements of an introduction. Jot down your ideas in relation to each of the points.


How will that chapter help you to answer your research question? How do the chapters follow on from one another? Jot down what you will argue in each of your chapter sections. How does each chapter section contribute to your chapter's argument? What evidence will you draw on? Reflect on your overall thesis structure.

Supervenience in Ethics

Are the sections organised around your themes or analytical points? Do you leave plenty of room to address counterarguments? Would another structure work? When you have a draft outline, carefully review it with your supervisor: If so, remove or rework it. Is there missing material to add?

  1. However, Section 2 below will show that if we reinterpret the modalities involved, these theses will no longer be equivalent. Because it does not posit known relations between specific ethical and base properties, Intuitive Conceptual does not face the difficulties of Strong Conceptual.
  2. And this in turn might seem to cast doubt on the coherence of particularism. Consider first a reductive account that identified the ethical properties with some natural or supernatural property.
  3. Now that the difficulties here have been made clear especially by Sturgeon 2009 , this is an important potential locus for future research.
  4. However, influential early discussions of this sort of thesis seemed to have something else in mind. This entry will not explore these interesting issues.

Whenever you want to make a major change to your work, outlining it first can help you to consider new, more persuasive possibilities for structure. Another way to test whether your thesis structure is persuasive and logical is to talk about it with someone who knows very little about your topic.

You can also make an appointment at ASLC to discuss your argument map. To do this, first consider your research question, and how you would persuade someone that your response is defensible. For example, if you have a question that asks for a comparison of two or more case studies, your structure needs to enable you to make that comparison effectively.

Thesis argument maps

You might have a chapter or section that provides a brief overview of each case study. Then, you could have a chapter that compares the case studies in relation to one variable or theme.

You could then follow with a chapter that compares the case studies in relation to another variable or theme, and so on. In this way, you would have a structure that enables comparison.

If a part of your thesis does not seem to fit in, ask yourself how it helps you to answer the question.

Thesis structures

This can help you to identify where it would fit better. Otherwise, you might need to cut the section out of your thesis — you could consider whether it would work well in a separate publication instead. When you look at them, consider: