College papers help

The three arguments and myths of gun control

Nazi laws disarmed "unreliable" persons, especially Jewsbut relaxed restrictions for "ordinary" German citizens.

Zelman in a book they published in 1992. In it, they compared the German gun laws of 1928 and 1938, and the U. Congressional hearings for what became the Gun Control Act of 1968. In the Los Angeles Times, he wrote: Could 50,000-70,000 Khmer Rouge have butchered 2-3 million armed Cambodians?

These questions bear repeating. The answers are by no means clear, but it is unconscionable they are not being asked.

  • Steinweis wrote in a New York Times piece;
  • If someone had a gun at the scene of a mass shooting, tragedy could have been prevented;
  • Zelman in a book they published in 1992.

Gun Control Act of 1968? Republican Presidential Primaries candidate Ben Carson said that Hitler's mass murder of Jews "would have been greatly diminished" if Germans had not been disarmed by the Nazis.

  • The Second Amendment and recent Supreme Court decisions do not block stronger gun laws;
  • Assault weapons were banned in the U.

Republican Representative Don Youngproposed the question "How many Jews were put in the ovens because they were unarmed". Political scientist Robert Spitzer said in the same law review as Harcourt, who stated the same thing the quality of Halbrook's historical research is poor.

Navigation menu

Pierce wrote in his 1994 pamphlet: In fact, Jews were not well-armed and were not able to adequately defend themselves against Nazi aggression. Thus, reimagining a past in which they were and did does not provide a legitimate basis for arguments about what might have followed. In the encyclopedic 2012 book, Guns in American Society, Holocaust scholar Michael Bryant says Halbrook, LaPierre, Zelman, Dave Kopeland others' "use of history has selected factual inaccuracies, and their methodology can be questioned.

The Holocaust has no place in this discussion and it is offensive to link this tragedy to such a debate.

Nazi gun control argument

Steinweis wrote in a New York Times piece: The Jews of Germany constituted less than 1 percent of the country's population. It is preposterous to argue that the possession of firearms would have enabled them to mount resistance against a systematic program of persecution implemented by a modern bureaucracy, enforced by a well-armed police state, and either supported or tolerated by the majority of the German population. Inside Germany, only the army possessed the physical force necessary for defying or overthrowing the Nazis, but the generals had thrown in their lot with Hitler early on.