College papers help


A discussion on the choice of policy instruments and policy development

Functions, objectives and instruments of policy It is useful to distinguish three rather different functions in relation to policies. Firstly there is policy making the act of making the decisions concerned, and policy-making is naturally the prerogative of senior people just how senior depending on the importance of the policy concerned.

Secondly there is policy implementation - the executive activity of carrying out the decisions made. Thirdly there is policy analysis the activity of identifying different policy choices and of examining the actual or possible impact of these alternative policies to see how successfully they comply with the policies' objectives.

Policy-making, policy implementation and policy analysis may all be carried out by the same people, but in countries wealthy enough to afford the trained manpower policy implementation and analysis are often carried out by specialist groups of middle-level officials who advise and receive instructions from the top-level policy makers. This paper is not substantially concerned with policy implementation.

  • In pursuit of these objectives a government has a wide variety of instruments that it can use;
  • Hood argues that "selecung the nght tool for the job often turns out to be a matter of faith and pohtics rather than of certainty" p 9 Instead, more typical of the conunua approaches;
  • This paper is not substantially concerned with policy implementation.

Implicit in the concept of having or making a policy is that one has a choice or option to have this policy or some other one. If, in practice, there is no choice then there can be no policy either.

But in considering options it is again useful to distinguish choices between the objectives of policy - including the objective of overcoming particular problems that have arisen - and choices between the different instruments, i.

Objectives and instruments are conceptually distinct and both are integral to having a policy although some writers e. Thomson and Rayner, restrict the scope of the term to policy instruments. Objectives and instruments are best explained by way of examples.

Let us take the example of policies with respect to dairy marketing systems, i. These are not the only possible objectives of policy in respect to dairy marketing but they are among the most common.

In pursuit of these objectives a government has a wide variety of instruments that it can use.

  • There are then, conceptually, two rather different sorts of choices to make;
  • However, he also argues that, regardless of the size of the sociai group affected, if govemments want voluntary compliance from the group they will not uUlize coercive instruments;
  • Firstly there is policy making the act of making the decisions concerned, and policy-making is naturally the prerogative of senior people just how senior depending on the importance of the policy concerned;
  • The reason for this failure has very little to do with the quality of the analyses or the nature of the cases examined Rather it is a direct result of the fact that, as all of the analysts have pointed out, instrument choice is context bound As such;
  • Following Mayntz, Hood argues that if large and well-organized sociai groups exist, govemments will uUlize persuasion and expenditure instruments Hood notes that the size of the target group is significant since the larger the group to be affected, the more hkely govemments will use "passive" rather than "acuve" insuuments;
  • In this view, the actual choice of instrument, then, is made on essentially technical grounds, according to efficiency and cost cnteria, but also according to the political preferences of interest groups and governments, including sociological and ideological constraints; and taking into account institutional limitations of the political system In the case of conunua models such as Dahl and Lindblom's the same basic logic applies although the emphasis on the technical capacity of specific instruments is replaced by an emphasis on the elements of the organiza- tional capacity of governments and societies which define the continua Table 1 Dahl and Lindblom's Continua of Instrument Choice Continuum 1.

Some instruments can serve several objectives while others serve only one objective and may hinder others. Secure economies of scale in collection, processing and distribution, ii. Operate monopolistic or monopsonistic trading practices which enable the trading organisation to discriminate in prices and quantities for or against particular groups of consumers, producers or products, and iii.

There was a problem providing the content you requested

Achieve improvements in quality and hygiene through direct managerial control of processing, transport and storage. Again, this list of instruments is illustrative rather than all-inclusive.

Objectives and instruments in dairy marketing are discussed in detail by Mbogoh Policy makers can make choices with respect to both objectives and instruments.

Such choices do not have to be totally exclusive, i. On the other hand, different objectives may and frequently do conflict.

Quick links

To take an example from dairy marketing, it is clearly difficult both to pay high prices to producers and to ensure low prices to urban consumers unless the government has substantial spare funds at its disposal with which to pay a heavy subsidy - a happy situation which very few if any governments in sub-Saharan Africa face. Thus although governments do not have to opt exclusively for just one objective it is important that they consider which of these objectives are the most important and how much of progress towards one objective they are prepared to sacrifice in order to make progress towards another.

World Bank Group Archives Holdings

If policy makers can become clear in their minds about what their priorities are as between different policy objectives, it then becomes possible to select the set of instruments which most efficiently promotes those objectives. There are then, conceptually, two rather different sorts of choices to make.

  • Each government may apply different weights to various criteria when evaluating GHG mitigation policy options depending on national and sector level circumstances;
  • Each government may apply different weights to various criteria when evaluating GHG mitigation policy options depending on national and sector level circumstances;
  • It is useful to distinguish three rather different functions in relation to policies.

Firstly, choices about objectives; secondly, choices about which instruments to employ in order to pursue best those objectives. This may seem obvious to the point of tedium. In practice, however, actual discussions Of Policy issues in developing and developed countries alike often fail to distinguish clearly between instruments and the objectives or the problems which a policy is supposed to solve. In the ensuing mental confusion special interest groups who have no real claim to priority on social, economic or even political grounds, but who are blessed with fluent spokesmen, are able to secure privileges for themselves which are costly to the nation as a whole and which a more clear-sighted approach to policy would have avoided granting.